Conservation at Copan

By: Lynn Grant

Originally Published in 1999

View PDF

One of my favorite parts of archaeo­logical conservation is being a field conser­vator and working with the archaeologists on site at an excavation. There’s a special thrill in being the first one to work on an artifact, in helping to unlock the information it can reveal about the people who made and used it. Therefore, I was delighted when invited by the Early Copan Acropolis Program (ECAP) to go with them to Copan.

The archaeologists had recently uncovered some early elite burials within the Acropolis that contained fragile artifacts in need of immediate conservation. A colleague, Harriet (Rae) Beaubi­en of the Smithsonian Institution, had been on hand to provide conservation support in the first phases of the excavation, but as the extent and condition of the finds became clearer, she sug­gested that they bring in a conservator from the University of Pennsylvania Museum. With the co­operation of the Museum’s Senior Conservator, Virginia Greene, and the Museum Director, I have been “lent” to the RECAP team for part of their excavation season each year since 1995.

Field conservation is quite different from conservation within a museum setting. The primary importance of the artifacts is in the infor­mation they provide and, due to the essentially destructive nature of excavation, the archaeo­logical team has only one chance to excavate each area fully. The conservator works as part of a team including the archaeologists and other specialists to ensure that every artifact gives up the maximum possible amount of data. There are three main ways in which conservation con­tributes to this process: in retrieval (ensuring fragile artifacts survive excavation), interpreta­tion (helping make artifacts more informative through cleaning, mending, and material stud­ies), and preservation (extending the post-exca­vation life of the artifacts).

Some of the artifacts uncovered are so fragile or ephemeral that they cannot be lifted without in situ conservation. At Copan, this happens fre­quently enough that most of my time on site has been spent working in the tunnel excavations (Fig. 1). One sort of material requiring special retrieval techniques is what we call P005 (Painted Organic Objects). The ancient Maya used many items made of organic materials (wood, bark cloth, gourds) which were often brightly painted. Over the last i500 years, the organic substrate has completely decayed, leaving only the paint layer, sometimes with a stucco undercoat. By the time the archaeologists uncover these items, they exist only as paint traces in a block of soil (Fig. 2) or as a pile of paint flakes, depend­ing on the burial conditions.

In a deposit uncovered in 1993, the excava­tors had come across a POGO of the paint-trace type. Wisely, they left the deposit unexcavated until a conservator was available to assist them. The whole block of soil containing the paint trace was removed (Fig. 3) and brought to an area of the tunnel where it could be worked on. I then carried out a micro-excavation, uncovering the surviving paint layer using dental tools, bamboo skewers, soft brushes, and a lot of patience. Where necessary, I strengthened the paint with applications of special conservation polymers as I went. Once the surface was exposed, a temporary facing was applied to the paint surface to replace the structural stability lost with the decay of the organic substrate. The surface was then turned over, the underside excavated, and a supportive backing applied. The temporary facing was then removed to expose the full painted surface, al­lowing the archaeologists to study it and identify the pictorial motifs (Fig. 4).

Where the only evidence of a painted object is a pile of paint flakes, retrieval is even more chal­lenging. The unsupported paint can disintegrate at a touch, so the archaeologists’ usual methods of digging, brushing, and scooping cannot be used. These paint flakes are lifted by touching a barely moistened artist’s paintbrush to their surface. The paint clings to the damp bristles long enough to be removed to a small container. At present, we have over 40 small dishes of paint flakes awaiting study and reconstruction (Fig. 5); these represent at least seven painted organic objects from one group in the Margarita upper chamber (see Bell et alb., this issue). The upper chamber of this tomb also, amazingly, contained preserved examples of bas­ketry (Fig. 6), which we were able to excavate and lift using conservation procedures. These organic artifacts are examples of material seldom recovered from Maya excavations due to their fragility and tendency to decay, and they will provide more in­sight into Maya art and material culture.

Another class of Copan artifacts often re­quiring conservatorial intervention are mosaics.

The Maya decorated many artifacts with tiny mo­saic tiles of shell, jade, or hematite. The natural adhesives used to hold the tiles in place have usu­ally failed and the tiles are either scattered or held only by gravity. Where the pattern is still discernible, it can be preserved by applying a fac­ing, as above, before the mosaic is moved. Oth­erwise, the tiles are retrieved separately, using a micro-grid to record their relative positions, and the conservator works in the lab to restore the mosaic pattern using modern, stable adhesives. One spectacular example of this sort of work is the jade and shell inlaid disk uncovered in a dis­turbed burial during the 1992 season. The shell disk was broken into five fragments, four of which had fallen face-down and had most of their inlays displaced. Once the fragments had been retrieved, I worked to find the correct settings for the detached inlays, a job made easier by the extreme precision of the ancient Maya craftsman who produced this masterpiece (Fig. 7). As I worked, Field Director David Sedat was soon able to identify the subject of the design—a magical bird wearing a maize headdress. In turn, his identification made the rest of the reconstruction easier, an excellent example of the advantages of having the archaeologist and conservator working together. Given this amazing artifact, imagine our excitement when, in 1999. a second shell disk was uncovered during excavation of the floor of the Hunal Tomb, this one inlaid with jade. shell. and seed pearls, bearing a glyphic inscription, and accompanied by shell animals (Fig. 8).

Because objects represent information, it is essential that they be preserved for future gen­erations when further study or advanced analyti­cal techniques may reveal more about those who made or used them. The ECAP team has made great strides in preserving their excavated mate­rial, providing museum-quality steel cabinets and archival storage materials for artifacts stored in the local research center. Before this, carefully excavated objects were too often eaten by insects or mice or damaged by improper storage. Even now, Honduran termites have proved unexpectedly determined, finding gaps in the new steel cabinets and tunneling their way up three shelves to consume the cardboard box­es holding paint fragments. Our lesson learned, we now seal all possible gaps and store materials only in “inedible” containers. Labeling is also done with non-paper-based polymers to pre­vent loss of essential context information to in­sect depredation.

The cooperation between archaeologists and conservators at Copan has achieved true synergy; working together we are able to achieve more than we could separately. This productive team­work continues as ECAP’s work in the Acropolis draws to a close.

Cite This Article

Grant, Lynn. "Conservation at Copan." Expedition Magazine 41, no. 2 (July, 1999): -. Accessed February 24, 2024.

This digitized article is presented here as a historical reference and may not reflect the current views of the Penn Museum.

Report problems and issues to