Excavating an Enigma

The Latest Discoveries from Tell es-Sweyhat

By: Michael D. Danti and Richard L. Zettler

Originally Published in 2002

View PDF

An excavation is all the more intriguing when it unveils something totally unexpected. Tell es-Sweyhat in northern Syria has much to tell about life in a Bronze Age urban center. But the fact that a complex society flourished there raises some questions.

A thriving city is not what you would expect to find in an area where the success of local agriculture is unpre­dictable. Yet Tell es-Sweyhat is just such a puzzle.

Despite its location in a region that averages only eight to 12 inches of rain per year, and that with high variability from one year to the next, the city, on the east bank of the Euphrates River, was indeed flour­ishing at the end of the third millennium Lc. (ca. 2152-2202). How did such a large fortified city evolve from a small village?

The University of Pennsylvania Museum has been coordinating excavations in Tell es-Sweyhat for more than 12 years now. Research has taken two parallel but interrelated tracks, continuing to focus on the topography of the urban center while intensifying investigations of what we have called the Tell es-Sweyhat enigma.

The large ruin mound of Tell es-Sweyhat promises unique insight into the dynamics of human exist­ence in marginal environments such as the “transition” zone between the well-watered lands of northern and western Syria and the desert steppe. In such areas of the Middle East, rainfall agriculture, although possible, is precarious, and animal (primarily sheep and goat) herding would have been a critical part of subsistence then as it is today. With an economy geared to pastoral production, Tell es-Sweyhat chal­lenges conventional understanding of early complex societies. One of those challenges surfaced during our 2220 and 2201 field seasons, when we made the particularly exciting discovery of monu­mental architecture. The impres­sive structures, dating to the early third millennium B.C., have radi­cally altered our assumptions about Tell es-Sweyhat’s evolution.

THE MAKINGS OF A DISCOVERY

The plan for our 2000 and 2221 excavations was to focus on the as yet unexcavated top of Tell es­-Sweyhat’s high mound. We hoped to uncover the buildings at the heart of the late third millennium citadel. We assumed these build­ings would be contemporary with ancillary warehouse and kitchen buildings excavated on the western periphery of the mound. Since those structures were terraced into the side of the mound, the central structures would have stood on a level several meters above them.

We also planned to undertake several operations in the outer town, where geomagnetic survey -I remote sensing technique that produces images of subsurface con­ditions — had been used to map buildings and the city’s outer fortifications in 1993 and 1995. We were particularly intrigued by the eastern outer city gate, known from our geomagnetic maps, which promised to be the earliest example of the two-chambered gates typical of Middle Bronze Age (Canaanite) fortifications in both Syria and Palestine. We were also interested in the southern end of the outer town, where our 1998 excava­tions had uncovered well-preserved remains. Various factors forced us, however, to shift resources to the high mound and restrict our work in the southern end of the outer town. These factors included a prolonged drought that turned the outer town into pow­der, promising messy digging conditions, and bedouin who camped in the outer town and farmed the area we wanted to excavate.

We approached the high mound by laying out two series of excavation units, one on its western and the other on its southern slope. Much to our surprise, excavations in 2000 turned up only remains of the early to mid third millennium settlement, with little evidence of an overlying late third millennium occu­pation. The only exception, uncovered at the northern edge of our southern trenches, was an unusually wide mudbrick wall, preserved more than 12 courses (lay­ered rows of bricks) high, with a doorjam covered with a thick gypsum plaster — reliable evidence for an important building. Although we did not know it at the time, this intriguing discovery would prove to be the core of the late third millennium citadel, but we had to wait a year to satisfy our curiosity.

Continued excavation in summer 2001 revealed that the door was 1.3 meters wide and had a stepped stone threshold. The northeast corner of the stone slab in the doorway was broken, and a pivot for a doorpost, about 5 centimeters in diameter, was worn into the floor there. The doorway stood at the western corner of a single large (6 by 10 meters) room on the northern side of a court­yard. The building had burned in antiquity. Charred roof beams, probably of poplar and 5-10 centimeters in diameter, lay on the floor, as did several smashed ceram­ic vessels. The jars date the building to the late third mil­lennium, contemporary with our ancillary storage and kitchen buildings on the citadel’s western periphery.

The unusually wide mudbrick walls of the room were set on stone footings and were buttressed on the outside. In a deep alcove formed by two buttresses we found frag­mentary paintings. (Wall paintings are also known From nearby Halawa [Lüth 1989] and Mutnbaqa [Machule et al. 1986].) Inside the room, the walls had shallow piers perhaps associated with roofing requirements or with carrying the weight of a second story. A low rnudbrick bench ran around the room.

Although we know of no exact parallels for the Tell es-Sweyhat building complex, the room is simi­lar in general form to buildings from nearby Tell Halawa B, whose German excavators have described them as “sacral” in character despite the fact that their plans are atypical of other known Syrian tem­ples (Lath 1989). Our complex’s location at the center of the high mound, as well as its architectural elabo­ration and paintings, emphasizes its elite character, while the size of the room and the bench suggest a public reception function. The complex might have served as a gathering place for the elders of the city, who are attested in the somewhat earlier archival texts from Ehla’s Royal Palace G as standing along­side the king as the highest authority of the state (Archi 1995:115).

TELL ES-SWEYHAT: FROM VILLAGE TO FORTIFIED CENTER

Previous work at Tell es-Sweyhat suggested the settle­ment was small and relatively inconsequential until the latter part of the Early Bronze Age (ca. 2322-2000 B.C.), when it grew to urban proportions (roughly 100 acres). However, excavations in 2222 and 2201 revealed that the early third millennium settlement had monumental mudbrick platforms on the western and southern sides of the high mound that would have required substantial labor, implying the presence of a powerful, centralized political authority.

We had already uncovered part of the mudbrick platform on the western side of the high mound in 1993, and initially described it as “likely to be a plat­form or terrace built on the northern slope of the mound, presumably to expand the area for building” (Zettler et al. 1997). However, we largely ignored the structure until 2000, when we cut a narrow trench through it to link our excavations on the western edge of the mound to operations near its summit. The trench revealed a solid mudbrick platform that had been enlarged a number of times, so we continued work on it in 2001.

We uncovered the core structure in the center of our trench. It was built in segments, and a substantial but­tress masked the join of two segments. The core struc­ture was at least 5.5 meters high. Its face, about 3.2 meters from the eastern balk (edge) of the trench, was stepped back, or battered, and covered with a heavy red plaster. We were unable to reach the building floor of the core structure.

In 2221, having already discovered that the platform was built in segments and phases, we experimented with scraping and sweeping the existing top of the platform to see if we could find seams in the brickwork. A small investment of time revealed the outline of at least parts of several phases of the platform’s construction, includ­ing the northern face and western corner of the core platform. The core platform was an irregular rectangle whose northern face was at least 10 meters in length.

The western half of the core construction was enlarged multiple times over the course of its long history. The latest enlargement of the construction, clearly visible from our surface scraping, was the facing of red and gray mudbricks set on and against the stone footings we first uncovered in 1993. The enlargement resulted in a rounded western face. A 1-meter-wide wall — perhaps part of a tower ­projected from the front of the facing and ran to the south.

In 2201, we enlarged our excavations at the north­ern end of Operation 12 to trace the platform’s late facing. We found the join of the facade with the phase that immediately preceded it, but our excava­tions yielded additional results — a stairway leading to the top of the platform that existed during the intermediate and latest building phases. On top of the platform, a vaulted corridor about 1.25 meters wide led to the east. As for the dating of the western platform, houses on the east side associated with the core platform contained pottery dating to the early to mid third millennium, while houses on the west side that are associated with the building floor of the plat­form’s latest enlargement yielded pottery that can be dated to the mid to late third millennium. The pot­tery provides a terminus ante quem (a reference point for dating purposes) for different phases of the plat­form’s construction.

On the opposite side of the high mound, in our southern trenches, we exposed a portion of the southern side of a second monumental platform in 2000. We continued work on the southern platform in 2021. We now know this freestanding structure was minimally 3.3 meters high and 9.2 meters east to west by 12.6 meters north to south. As in the case of the western platform, we have yet to find the platform’s base, but in the closing week of the 2021 field season we uncov­ered a stone-paved surface on its south side. However, this is probably the uppermost paving in a long sequence of superimposed surfaces associated with the platform. We expect the platform to continue down below this level, or that we will find an earlier precur­sor to this structure. Two walls running perpendicular to the platform’s southern side likely served as the retaining walls for an earthen ramp that provided access to the top of the platform. Similar retaining walls were associated with the Dagan temple’s ziggurat at Mari, located about 400 kilometers (242 miles) south of Tell es-Sweyhat on the middle Euphrates near the Iraqi border (Parrot 1974).

The dating of the southern platform is based on ceramics found in the soil layers and houses that cov­ered it when it fell out of use. These sherds indicate that the southern platform fell into ruin sometime during the mid third millennium. At that time, the monument was allowed to deteriorate, and the west­ern side suffered greatly from erosion caused by wind and rain. Gradually, houses of the mid third millennium were built against the western side of the platform and eventually over the top of it. A sub­stantial deposit of trash and ashy debris covered the southern side. As implied above, we have found only traces of late third millennium occupation in this area. These layers appear to have eroded after the site’s abandonment in the early second millennium. Later Hellenistic occupants of the site (third and sec­ond centuries B..) removed these strata to level the mound’s slope for new buildings.

We can only speculate about the function of the monumental mudbrick constructions in our western and southern operations at Tell es-Sweyhat. They bring to mind temple platforms known from nearby sites such as Halawa B (Lath 1989), as well as ramps or platforms associated with Temple BA at Tell Mozan (Dohmann-Pfälzner and Pfãlzner 1999), and Biblical high places, or bamah. The platforms re­semble constructions such as Tell Banat’s White Monument (Porter 2220) and Jerablus-Tahtani’s Tomb 322 (Peltenberg et al. 1995), though we have no evidence that our platforms were funerary in character. Alternatively, the platforms could be part of a fortification system. Only further excavation will provide the answer.

LIGHTING THE “DARK AGE”

The early third millennium in Mesopotamia has been described as a sort of “dark age,” characterized by “political devolution,” following the collapse of southern Uruk—influenced polities and preceding the reemergence of city-states in Syria (Schwartz 1994). This period is commonly thought of as stagnant in terms of cultural developments, but the new discoveries at Tell es-Sweyhat suggest this may not be the case.

In fact, future exploration of the two monumental platforms promises to provide unprecendented evi­dence for a high level of social and political complex­ity for the early third millennium along the upper Euphrates, and in northern Mesopotamia more gener­ally. For Tell es-Sweyhat’s later period of occupation, excavation of the late third millennium summit will reveal evidence of those who ruled during the city’s twilight years.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The 2000 and 2001 excavations at Tell es-Sweyhat were funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities (RZ-20590-00), as well as by a generous gift from Mr. Eric Schoenberg. In addition. our work on the early to mid third millen­nium mudbrick platforms in 2001 was supported by an American Philosophical Society Franklin Research Grant to Michael D. Daunt.

Cite This Article

Danti, Michael D. and Zettler, Richard L.. "Excavating an Enigma." Expedition Magazine 44, no. 1 (March, 2002): -. Accessed February 28, 2024. https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/excavating-an-enigma/


This digitized article is presented here as a historical reference and may not reflect the current views of the Penn Museum.

Report problems and issues to digitalmedia@pennmuseum.org.